Spoiler alert
The author approached the system, the system approached the author. No better or worse than many other working systems. Without experience, it is definitely not worth trading on it, the method of following his footsteps is unusual (his stop is virtual, about 0.5 % of the depot, as far as I understand), plus you need to know how to trade on PA on small timeframes. And you also need to follow the news, it can be critical. I don't know how long the author traded Forex before he started trading profitably on this system. I think it's been years.
By setting the time of the indicator - I have on Tickmill and ICMarkets it turns out almost like the author if in the last laid out indicator (which is Auto) to change the time to 2, I do not change anything else at all.
Another thing that surprises - how with intensive manual trading with decent money at stake, people post messages on FF all the time and post music...it should be either supertradunami or zvezdunami...
The picture is the author's with FF - so the author traded May...if it's true-then he's very cool, what can I say.
To be honest, I didn't see any method for following the footsteps, and it's strange to put a virtual stop at all, but to trall with real ones. Yes, it is possible, but why, it does not pipsuet? In addition, the May screen does not say that it trades with a loss limit, because there may be unprofitable trades in the averages, it is better to say that they are almost always there, and even the yield curve in principle confirms the presence of averaging unprofitable orders, and not fixed stops. There would be a normal open monitoring, everything would be clear and understandable, but I understand it is not.
For me, these screenshots say everything, in terms of the principles of trading.
Spoiler alert
Just as an example, a picture from the author of the vehicle, old, but I saw a lot of such in the topic. The face is not a distributed position, but the usual averaging with increasing volumes. Went from the level, the price went further. Now, if the author put a short stop here for the next level, the price would go to it, then there would probably be a re-entry from the next level. The author did not put it, poured a bunch of positions, averaged a large volume and guessed. Then he wrote that the price for TDI was confirmed on 78, that's just a screen with H1, and on M15 TDI just a couple of three bars ago was confirmed, as well as possibly the formation of bars, where he entered the first order before averaging. That's the trick. I repeat that not only this screen seemed strange to me. Therefore, for myself, I took this strategy without stops (or yes, with some not weak stops) closer to the grid models that I stopped trading a long time ago.
Spoiler alert
What are these assumptions based on?
Pivots are the same as pulling the fibo and thinking that here 61.8 and here there will be a reversal, as well as 78.6(76.4), and after breaking through the 100-ki, of course, everything points to the continuation of the trend, without five minutes of 1-2-3. It looks like what the author suggests, doesn't it? Looks like. There are a lot of such vehicles and all of them, unfortunately, do not work. Except on the forums for context.
But first of all, it is based on the fact that I did not see the fix from the author.stop. That's it. If he was, and not these 5-10 positions at "one" price, which are not rare for him to close all at once, then we could definitely say about the profitability. Usually, a simple martingale principle is hidden behind a bunch of positions. And the year of its registration and how much it trades do not say anything from the word at all. And the yield chart from the terminal does not show a real drawdown. I naturally do not dissuade trading on this strategy, but short stops clearly will not bring profit, it is enough to analyze all this information, run through the chart.
Last edited by a moderator: